open i

www.openi.co.uk
factotum@openi.co.uk
Open-i.ca Home | Openi.co.uk Archive | Open-i.ca Recent Opinion | About the open i


The Postwick Bonfire

- Sunday December 1, 2002

For email notice of new copy contact open i .

Author's comments

Note to Editors: While the information on this website is copyrighted, you are welcome to use it as is provided that you quote the source and notify the author.
If copy is of interest to you, but you find it a little dated and/or not quite suitable for your readership and you wish to use it with revisions, contact the author. In most instances I should be able to revise it at short notice.
If you wish exclusive us of copy, again contact the author and this can be arranged.

Caution: Be warned Opinion and Analysis like fresh fish and house guests begins to smell after a few days. Always take note of the date of any opinion or analysis. If you want an update on anything that has been be covered by the open i, contact the author .

Opinion & Analysis: Opinion without analysis or reasoning and Analysis without opinion or conclusion are equally useless. So Opinion and Analysis are a continuum. Copy that puts emphasis on and quantifies reasoning is identified as Analysis. In the interest of readability the presentation of analytical elements may be abridged. If you require more than is presented, contact the author.

Retro Editing: It is my policy generally not to edit material after it has been published. What represents fair comment for the time will be kept, even if subsequent events change the situation. Understanding the wisdom of the time is of value. Struck-out text may be used to indicate changed situations. Contact the author for explanations.

The body of the text of anything that proves to be embarrassingly fallacious will be deleted, but the summary will be retained with comment as to why the deletion has occurred. This will act as a reminder to the author to be more careful.

Contact:
David Walker
Postwick, Norwich
NR13 5HD, England
phone: +44 (0)1603 705 153
email: davidw@openi.co.uk
top of page

That environmentalists object to the English celebration of Guy Fawkes probably has more to do with their attitude to life than the environmental considerations. (380 words)

Postwick, like many other villages in England, has for many years built an oversized bonfire in early November which is lit with a degree of ceremony to celebration the foiling of The Gunpowder Plot.

Guy Fawkes, a Roman Catholic, with a small group of accomplices attempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament on November 5, 1605 with gun powder smuggled into its cellars. The occasion was the opening of parliament and the motivation was a protest against the anti-Roman Catholic laws of the time. He was caught in the act and with his co-conspirators was hung.

Few people would suggest that this security triumph merited annual celebration for almost 400 years even at this time when security is a priority of all governments. But Guy Fawkes Night is still celebrated across the length and breath of the kingdom.

There is, of course, considerable currency in the security context. But little is made of this. The reality is that at this time of year most gardeners have a lot of combustible material to dispose of, particularly in Postwick, and burning it in a corner of the village playing field is a convenient way of getting the job done.

The fireworks industry has also probably done much to promote the practice. But this element of the traditional celebration does not feature prominently at Postwick, probably because most villagers figure they have better uses for their money than burning it.

Even the tradition of placing an effigy of Guy Fawkes at the top of the bonfire is not observed. This might be regarded as politically incorrect in view of the habit four hundred years ago of the monarchs of the day of disposing of prominent Christian of opposing denomination by burning them at the stake.

But even this simple, functional and comforting bonfire is now threatened. Bonfires are seen as being environmentally unfriendly. One would suppose the environmental objections are that they create air pollution and contribute to global warming.

More likely, however, the objections are to the very conspicuous nature of fireworks displays and bonfires. Those who do not have the wealth to afford fireworks or the spirit to build a bonfire resent the celebrations. And this is in all probability the fundamental motivation of many environmentalists.

December 1, 2002



Enter recipient's e-mail:

top of page
Maintained by:David Walker . Copyright © 2002. David Walker. Copyright & Disclaimer Information. Last Revised/Reviewed: 021203